Research first
Interviews, contextual enquiry and journey analysis before screens.
Design
UI/UX Design & Prototyping
Design that is validated with users before a line of production code is written.
Overview
What this gives you
Most interfaces fail because nobody checked whether the model made sense to the people using it. Research and prototyping are not decoration; they are the cheapest way to find out that a workflow is wrong while changing it is still cheap.
We start with interviews and observation, map the journey, and wireframe the flows at low fidelity. Only when the structure holds do we go to high-fidelity screens and interactive mockups, and test those with users as well.
- Supplied, installed and supported by Quridge Global Solutions from Bengaluru
- Written quotation with GST-inclusive pricing, warranty and AMC options
- Documentation, operator training and a named point of contact for support
At a glance
What you get
Structure before surface
Low-fidelity wireframes validate the flow, not the colour.
Clickable before built
Interactive mockups let stakeholders use the real thing.
Systems, not screens
A component library and design tokens your developers can build from.
Specification
Technical details
| Service | Output |
|---|---|
| UX interviews and behaviour research | Insight notes, personas and pain-point mapping |
| User journey analysis | End-to-end journey maps with friction points |
| Rapid wire-framing | Low-fidelity flows, tested and refined in days |
| High-fidelity UI | Pixel-accurate screens, component libraries and design tokens |
| Interactive mockups | Clickable prototypes for user testing and stakeholder review |
| Branding and design systems | Visual systems, iconography and a reusable component library |
Where it is used
Typical applications
The situations this is most often specified for, based on what we are asked to quote most often.
- New product definition and MVP design
- Application redesign and usability improvement
- Design system creation for product teams
- Complex operational and internal tools
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
We can do both, and keeping them together tends to be more efficient — the design system and the components are built to match what the developers will actually implement.
A representative group of real users completing representative tasks, observed, with findings ranked by severity. We report what blocked them and what we changed as a result.
We agree the number in the proposal, but we design in short cycles with review at each stage, so changes usually surface early when they are cheapest to absorb.
Related
Other options in this range
Need a recommendation?
Tell us your volume, media, site count and compliance requirement. We will come back with a model, a costed quotation and AMC options within one business day — with no obligation.